Saturday, December 14, 2019
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Thursday, November 14, 2019
When someone says that they believe in the "politics of the possible",
what they are actually saying is: 'I wish to maintain the status quo.'
Since when is the realm of possibility so narrow that it precludes an intelligent future from becoming a reality?
The easy road of politics as usual is a dead end road. Such are the politics of the unsustainable.
Since when is the realm of possibility so narrow that it precludes an intelligent future from becoming a reality?
The easy road of politics as usual is a dead end road. Such are the politics of the unsustainable.
Friday, August 30, 2019
"All left-wing parties in the highly industrialized countries are
at bottom a sham, because they make it their business to fight against
something which they do not really wish to destroy. They have
internationalist aims, and at the same time they struggle to keep up a
standard of life with which those aims are incompatible.
[...]
A humanitarian is always a hypocrite."
- George Orwell in his essay "Rudyard Kipling"
"He could not understand what was happening, because he had never had any grasp of the economic forces underlying imperial expansion. It is notable that Kipling does not seem to realize, any more than the average soldier or colonial administrator, that an empire is primarily a money-making concern. Imperialism as he sees it is a sort of forcible evangelizing. You turn a Gatling gun on a mob of unarmed 'natives', and then you establish 'the Law', which includes roads, railways and a court-house. He could not foresee, therefore, that the same motives which brought the Empire into existence would end by destroying it. It was the same motive, for example, that caused the Malayan jungles to be cleared for rubber estates, and which now causes those estates to be handed over intact to the Japanese. The modern totalitarians know what they are doing, and the nineteenth-century English did not not know what they were doing. Both attitudes have their advantages, but Kipling was never able to move forward from one into the other. His outlook, allowing for the fact that after all he was an artist, was that of the salaried bureaucrat"
- George Orwell in his essay "Rudyard Kipling"
[...]
A humanitarian is always a hypocrite."
- George Orwell in his essay "Rudyard Kipling"
"He could not understand what was happening, because he had never had any grasp of the economic forces underlying imperial expansion. It is notable that Kipling does not seem to realize, any more than the average soldier or colonial administrator, that an empire is primarily a money-making concern. Imperialism as he sees it is a sort of forcible evangelizing. You turn a Gatling gun on a mob of unarmed 'natives', and then you establish 'the Law', which includes roads, railways and a court-house. He could not foresee, therefore, that the same motives which brought the Empire into existence would end by destroying it. It was the same motive, for example, that caused the Malayan jungles to be cleared for rubber estates, and which now causes those estates to be handed over intact to the Japanese. The modern totalitarians know what they are doing, and the nineteenth-century English did not not know what they were doing. Both attitudes have their advantages, but Kipling was never able to move forward from one into the other. His outlook, allowing for the fact that after all he was an artist, was that of the salaried bureaucrat"
- George Orwell in his essay "Rudyard Kipling"
Friday, August 9, 2019
Monday, August 5, 2019
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Is there a term more Orwellian than Political Correctness?
Monday, May 27, 2019
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Friday, February 1, 2019
Thursday, January 10, 2019
"'Humanity'. - We do not regard animals as moral beings. But do you suppose the animals regard us as moral beings? - An animal which could speak said: 'Humanity is a prejudice of which we animals at least are free.'"
- Nietzsche Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality
- Nietzsche Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)